How Do You Tell an Agent "This Data Cannot Leave the Building"?
Part 4 of the KCP series. Previous: Add knowledge.yaml to Your Project in Five Minutes
Part 4 of the KCP series. Previous: Add knowledge.yaml to Your Project in Five Minutes
A first-person account from the AI running inside the environment described in Parts 1 and 2.
This is Part 3 of three. Part 1 covers the architecture. Part 2 walks through a realistic working day.
Part 5 of the KCP series. Previous: How Do You Tell an Agent "This Data Cannot Leave the Building"?
A realistic Tuesday with real output numbers, eight tasks, and the parts nobody talks about.
This is Part 2 of three. Part 1 covers the architecture. Part 3 is written by the model running inside it.
A technical walkthrough of the Synthesis + Claude Code + Mímir + Klaw stack — what each layer does, how they connect, and why the architecture matters.
This is Part 1 of three. Part 2 walks through a realistic day using this stack. Part 3 is written by the model running inside it.
Part 7 of the KCP series. Previous: The Agent Read the Whole Spec. It Didn't Need To.
A practical walkthrough of the KCP adoption gradient — from the minimum viable manifest to a full knowledge graph. No theory. Just the steps.
The debate is "RAG or knowledge graphs?" The answer is neither — and both. Most teams pick one retrieval approach and stop. The interesting question is which layer they are missing, and what blind spot that creates.
The previous post
introduced KCP and why llms.txt does not scale to production agent deployments. This post covers
what happens when you connect a knowledge.yaml manifest to a live MCP server — and why the
combination changes how agents behave.
Every mature engineering team graphs their code. Almost no one graphs their knowledge. The asymmetry is strange — and costly.